Design To Code Conversion Strategies for SaaS Founders

As a SaaS founder, turning Figma designs into clean, production-ready code is an essential step in building your product.

There are three effective ways to approach this:

  1. Do it yourself (DIY)
  2. Assign it to your internal frontend team
  3. Outsource it to a specialist

Strategy 1: DIY (Doing It Yourself as a Founder)

When you’re in the early stages of building a SaaS, converting designs to code yourself can be a practical way to start and keep momentum while assembling the right team.

Why Choose DIY?

  • You can start coding immediately without being blocked by hiring or outsourcing delays.
  • Laying the groundwork early ensures new hires can onboard smoothly and quickly contribute to development.

Challenges & How to Overcome Them

  • Slower execution time if you have other responsibilities that are taking your focus

    Solution: Allocate dedicated time blocks for coding, automate repetitive tasks, and use productivity techniques like the Pomodoro method to maintain momentum.

  • Takes time away from strategy and business development

    Solution: Set clear development sprints and time-box coding efforts to avoid distraction.

  • Risk of technical debt

    Solution: Keep code modular and document key decisions to ease future transitions to a professional development team.

DIY is a practical way to maintain momentum in the early stages, ensuring that development does not stall while you build the right team. Once the team is in place, transitioning responsibilities can help sustain long-term growth.

Strategy 2: Internal Developer Team

When you have an in-house frontend team, handling design-to-code internally creates a seamless integration between UI and product development. The key is ensuring it doesn’t pull developers away from core feature work and cause bottlenecks.

Why Choose an Internal Team?

  • Having an internal team ensures alignment with your product vision and maintains code quality.
  • Direct collaboration between developers and designers speeds up development and reduces miscommunication.
  • An internal team builds institutional knowledge, making future product updates smoother.
  • In-house developers are more invested in the product’s success and can prioritize based on business needs.

Challenges & How to Overcome Them

  • Potential slowdowns if developers are overloaded

    Solution: Use clear prioritization frameworks (e.g., Kanban, Agile sprints) to balance feature work with design-to-code tasks.

  • Lack of specialization in frontend development

    Solution: Consider dedicated frontend developers rather than pulling full-stack engineers away from backend or infrastructure work.

An internal team is great for ensuring long-term continuity and quality, but the key is managing their workload efficiently so the project continues moving forward without delays.

Strategy 3: Outsourcing

Outsourcing design-to-code work can be a powerful accelerator, helping SaaS founders move forward without overloading internal teams or getting bogged down by hiring constraints.

Why Choose Outsourcing?

  • Scales development quickly without hiring delays.
  • Frees up internal developers to focus on critical backend and feature work.
  • Access to specialized frontend talent that ensures high-quality implementation.

Challenges & How to Overcome Them

  • Risk of misalignment with product goals

    Solution: Provide clear design documentation, technical guidelines, and maintain close communication.

  • Quality inconsistencies can arise

    Solution: Vet external developers carefully, start with a smaller project milestone, and ensure they follow best practices.

  • Relying on external teams can lead to delays if they are unavailable or not aligned with your timelines

    Solution: Set up internal review processes to catch potential issues early and maintain flexibility to switch vendors if needed.

Outsourcing can be a highly effective way to keep the project moving forward without stretching internal resources too thin. The key is strong communication, clear expectations, and proactive quality control.